Search This Blog and Its Links

Thursday, February 25, 2010

You See What Ya' Wanna' See And You Hear What Ya' Wanna' Hear

New research just in!  People pay no attention to facts that challenge their preconceived ideas.  That's a ground shaker isn't it?

The Cultural Cognition Project at Yale has made this discovery.  It basically boils down to this.  Give people access to the facts about any issue and they then filter them through their cultural belief system, basically picking and choosing the facts they will accept to bolster their own belief system.

Give rugged individualists facts about climate change and tell them that the solution to global warming is to regulate industrial pollution and many then reject the climate science. But when you tell them that more nuclear power will fix the problem, says social scientist and lawyer Don Braman, "they said, you know, it turns out global warming is a serious problem. It doesn't matter whether you show them negative or positive information, they reject the information that is contrary to what they would like to believe, and they glom onto the positive information," Braman says.

The same can be said for the second group called "communitarians."  When given the same information about climate change, they say that industry needs to be regulated.  When told that nuclear power can help, they reject that.

Braman adds, "These two groups start to polarize as soon as you start to describe some of the potential benefits and harms."

"Basically the reason that people react in a close-minded way to information is that the implications of it threaten their values," says Dan Kahan, a law professor at Yale University and a member of The Cultural Cognition Project.

From vaccines to nanotechnology to climate change to gay parenting to whatever, we have our minds made up going in and nothing's going to change them, especially nothing as relevant as pesky little facts.

Here's a link to an article in Nature that delves a little deeper into this troubling situation.

5 comments:

  1. If this is true, then there is no such thing as a wise man. Everything ever spoken by Socrates, Ghandi, or Martin Luther King Jr. is just the byproduct of current cultural norms.

    They are not really wise or good men, they are just reacting to their already made up minds.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ..or the byproduct of opposing the current cultural norms, which would also still make the second paragraph true.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Regardless, with this line of thinking the fact remains the same: MLK and Mother Theresa are then not truly good people but simply products of time and place.

    With this theory one runs the risk of cheapening human achievement and the good that man has (in his limited capacity) accomplished.

    I think you underestimate the power of man's willingness to do good.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps they are product of time and place, but perhaps they stand outside of cultural groups. True leaders generally do.

    This study does not call into question the value or motivations of human achievement. It offers a view into the way people react to information based on cultural affiliations.

    Based on my experience, a person's willingness to do good is mitigated by what they consider good to be.

    And we must remember, great is different than good.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Based on my experience, a person's willingness to do good is mitigated by what they consider good to be.

    And we must remember, great is different than good."

    To a certain degree, I agree with the study- no mistake about that. Nevertheless, it does threaten to back man into a corner in which he simply will disregard truth because of his affiliation. Man is smarter than this. Many men are not.

    Furthermore, I believe that we run the risk of thrusting ourselves headlong into moral relativism if we simply say that man's notion of good (his notion of right and wrong) is simply based on his cultural affiliation.

    There are some things, I believe, that disregard national boundaries that are held universally within the human spirit. This study does not seem to entertain this notion.

    I suppose my main argument with this study is that it speak of particular affirmations as if they were universal positives.

    ReplyDelete